Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNuwagaba, Ephraim L.
dc.contributor.authorRule, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-07T09:16:11Z
dc.date.available2022-02-07T09:16:11Z
dc.date.issued2015-02-17
dc.identifier.citationNuwagaba, Ephraim L., Peter Rule (2015). Navigating the ethical maze in disability research: ethical contestations in an African context. Taylor&Francis Online: Disability & Society.https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2014.998333.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2014.998333
dc.identifier.urihttps://kyuspace.kyu.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/20.500.12504/387
dc.description255-269 p.en_US
dc.description.abstractDespite changes in how disability is viewed, ethical requirements for disability research have hardly changed. Some ethical clearance procedures, processes and practices still consider persons with disabilities as not able, creating unease among researchers and research participants with disabilities themselves. This paper considers five ethical contestations arising from research in the area of disability in an African context: positionality, vulnerability, signed consent, anonymity, and research committee composition. We argue that ethical requirements in practice are still largely based on a medical model of disability and propose that culturally sensitive social and human rights models should influence disability research ethics.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor&Francis Online: Disability & Society .en_US
dc.subjectResearch ethicsen_US
dc.subjectDisabilityen_US
dc.subjectSocial modelen_US
dc.subjectHuman rights modelen_US
dc.titleNavigating the ethical maze in disability research: ethical contestations in an African contexten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record