Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAziiza, Nahalomo
dc.contributor.authorPer Ole, Iversen
dc.contributor.authorBård Anders, Andreassen
dc.contributor.authorArchileo, Kaaya
dc.contributor.authorArchangel, Byaruhanga Rukooko
dc.contributor.authorPeter Milton, Rukundo
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-25T13:28:31Z
dc.date.available2023-05-25T13:28:31Z
dc.date.issued2023-04
dc.identifier.citationNahalomo, A., Iversen, P. O., Andreassen, B. A., Kaaya, A., Rukooko, A. B., & Rukundo, P. M. (2023). Food insecurity, dietary diversity and the right to adequate food among households in landslide-prone communities in Eastern Uganda: A cohort study. Plos one, 18(4), e0283078.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0283078
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12504/1353
dc.description.abstractWe assessed food insecurity, dietary diversity and the right to adequate food among house- holds in communities in Eastern Uganda that were affected by major landslides in 2010 and 2018. A prospective cohort study was applied to select 422 households during May-August (the food-plenty season) of 2019. In January-March (the food-poor season) of 2020, 388 households were re-assessed. Socio-demographic, food security, dietary diversity and right to adequate food data were collected using structured questionnaires. Four focus groups discussions and key informant interviews with 10 purposively sampled duty-bearers explored issues of food insecurity, dietary and the right to adequate food. The affected households had significantly higher mean (SE) food insecurity scores than controls, both during the food plenty season: 15.3 (0.5) vs. 10.8 (0.5), and during food-poor season: 15.9 (0.4) vs. 12.5 (0.0). The affected households had significantly lower mean (SE) dietary diversity scores than controls during the food plenty season: 5.4 (0.2) vs. 7.5 (0.2) and during the food poor season: 5.2 (0.2) vs. 7.3 (0.1). Multivariate analyses showed that the disaster event, education and main source of livelihood, were significantly associated with household food security and dietary diversity during the food-plenty season whereas during the food- poor season, the disaster event and education were associated with household food security and dietary diversity. During both food seasons, the majority of affected and control households reported to have consumed unsafe food. Cash-handout was the most preferred for ensuring the right to adequate food. Comprehension and awareness of human rights principles and state obligations were low. The severity of food-insecurity and dietary diversity differed significantly between the affected and control households during both food sea- sons. Moreover, the right to adequate food of landslide victims faced challenges to its realization. There is need for policy and planning frameworks that cater for seasonal variations, disaster effects and right to adequate food in order to reduce landslide victims’ vulnerability to food insecurity and poor dietary diversity. In the long-term, education and income diversification program interventions need to be integrated into disaster recovery programs since they are central in enhancing the resilience of rural livelihoods to shocks and stressors on the food system.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPlos Oneen_US
dc.subjectFood insecurityen_US
dc.subjectDietary diversityen_US
dc.subjectAdequate fooden_US
dc.subjectHouseholdsen_US
dc.subjectLandslide-prone communitiesen_US
dc.subjectEastern Ugandaen_US
dc.titleFood insecurity, dietary diversity and the right to adequate food among households in landslide-prone communities in Eastern Uganda: A cohort studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record