Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKwiringira, Japheth
dc.contributor.authorAtekyereza, Peter
dc.contributor.authorNiwagaba, Charles
dc.contributor.authorGünther, Isabel
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-28T08:34:31Z
dc.date.available2022-01-28T08:34:31Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationKwiringira, Japheth...et al (2014). Descending the sanitation ladder in urban Uganda: evidence from Kampala slums. BMC Public Health. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/624.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/624
dc.identifier.urihttps://kyuspace.kyu.ac.ug/xmlui/handle/20.500.12504/318
dc.description10 p.en_US
dc.description.abstractWhile the sanitation ladder is useful in analysing progressive improvements in sanitation, studies in Uganda have not indicated the sanitation barriers faced by the urban poor. There are various challenges in shared latrine use, cleaning and maintenance. Results from Kampala city indicate that, failure to clean and maintain sanitation infrastructure can lead to a reversal of the potential benefits that come with various sanitation facilities. Methods: A cross sectional qualitative study was conducted between March and May 2013. Data were collected through 18 focus group discussions (FGDs) held separately; one with women, men and youth respectively. We also used pictorial methods; in addition, 16 key informant interviews were conducted. Data were analysed using content thematic approach. Relevant quotations per thematic area were identified and have been used in the presentation of the results. Results: Whether a shared sanitation facility was improved or not, it was abandoned once it was not properly used and cleaned. The problem of using shared latrines began with the lack of proper latrine training when people do not know how to squat on the latrine hole. The constrained access and security concerns, obscure paths that were filthy especially at night, lack of light in the latrine cubicle, raised latrines sometimes up to two metres above the ground, coupled with lack of cleaning and emptying the shared facilities only made a bad situation worse. In this way, open defecation gradually substituted use of the available sanitation facilities. This paper argues that, filthy latrines have the same net effect as crude open defection. Conclusion: Whereas most sanitation campaigns are geared towards provision of improved sanitation infrastructure, these findings show that mere provision of infrastructure (improved or not) without adequate emphasis on proper use, cleaning and maintenance triggers an involuntary descent off the sanitation ladder. Understanding this reversal movement is critical in sustainable sanitation services and should be a concern for all actors.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Nature: BMC Public Health volume .en_US
dc.subjectSanitation ladderen_US
dc.subjectImproved sanitationen_US
dc.subjectUnimproved sanitationen_US
dc.subjectLatrine useen_US
dc.subjectOpen defecationen_US
dc.subjectKampalaen_US
dc.subjectSlumsen_US
dc.titleDescending the sanitation ladder in urban Uganda: evidence from Kampala slumsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record