Microsatellite-based analysis reveals Aedes aegypti populations in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia result from colonization by both the ancestral African and the global domestic forms
View/ Open
Date
2024-01-24Author
Abadi, M. Mashlawi
Hussain, Alqahtani
Sara, A. Abuelmaali
Andrea, Gloria-Soria
Jassada, Saingamsook
Martha, Kaddumukasa
Ahmad, Hassn Ghzwani
Ahmed, A. Abdulhaq
Hesham, M. Al-Mekhlafi
Catherine, Walton
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762) mosquito is the main vector of dengue, chi-
kungunya and Zika and is well established today all over the world. The species
comprises two forms: the ancestral form found throughout Africa and a global do-
mestic form that spread to the rest of the tropics and subtropics. In Saudi Arabia, A.
aegypti has been known in the southwest since 1956, and previous genetic studies
clustered A. aegypti from Saudi Arabia with the global domestic form. The purpose
of this study was to assess the genetic structure of A. aegypti in Saudi Arabia and
determine their geographic origin. Genetic data for 17 microsatellites were col-
lected for A. aegypti ranging from the southwestern highlands of Saudi Arabia on
the border of Yemen to the north-west in Madinah region as well as from Thailand
and Uganda populations (as representatives of the ancestral African and global
domestic forms, respectively). The low but significant level of genetic structur-
ing in Saudi Arabia was consistent with long-distance dispersal capability possibly
through road connectivity and human activities, that is, passive dispersal. There
are two main genetic groupings in Saudi Arabia, one of which clusters with the Ugandan population and the other with the Thailand population with many Saudi
Arabian individuals having mixed ancestry. The hypothesis of genetic admixture
of the ancestral African and global domestic forms in Saudi Arabia was supported
by approximate Bayesian computational analyses. The extent of admixture varied
across Saudi Arabia. African ancestry was highest in the highland area of the Jazan
region followed by the lowland Jazan and Sahil regions. Conversely, the western
(Makkah, Jeddah and Madinah) and Najran populations corresponded to the global
domesticated form. Given potential differences between the forms in transmission
capability, ecology and behaviour, the findings here should be taken into account in
vector control efforts in Saudi Arabia.