Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPrativa, Poudel
dc.contributor.authorAnish, Ghimire
dc.contributor.authorGuy, Howard
dc.contributor.authorBarbara, Evans
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Camargo-Valero A.
dc.contributor.authorFreya, Mills
dc.contributor.authorOlivia, Reddy
dc.contributor.authorSubodh, Sharma
dc.contributor.authorSarana, Tuladhar
dc.contributor.authorAbraham, Geremew
dc.contributor.authorKenan, Okurut
dc.contributor.authorBaba, Ngom
dc.contributor.authorManish, Baidya
dc.contributor.authorSheila, Dangol
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-24T10:27:27Z
dc.date.available2023-10-24T10:27:27Z
dc.date.issued2023-04
dc.identifier.citationPoudel, P., Ghimire, A., Howard, G., Evans, B., Camargo-Valero, M. A., Mills, F., ... & Dangol, S. (2023). Field-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literature. Heliyon.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12504/1470
dc.description.abstractOn-site sanitation systems (OSS) are a source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Although ef- forts have been made recently to measure and quantify emissions from septic tanks using various field-based methods, the vast majority of published literature reporting GHG emissions from OSS units (e.g., pits and tanks) is based on non-empirical evidence. This systematic review presents an overview and limitations of field-based methods used for the quantification of GHG emissions from OSS. Papers published in English were searched in three databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, and Directory of Articles and Journals. Peer-reviewed papers that reported field-based methods applied to containment units in OSS were included in this study. Only eight out of 2085 papers met the inclusion criteria with septic tanks as the sole technology reported and were thus, considered for the review. Most of the studies have been conducted in middle- and high- income countries. Field-based measurements of GHGs are conducted using a flux chamber (FC) and the most commonly used FC methods are (a) the modified simple static FC, (b) automated static FC, and (c) floating FC. Data reported in published studies do not provide sufficient in- formation on the calibration and validation of the results from the FCs used. The complex FC designs, laborious fieldwork operations, and reliance on expensive, specialist equipment, suggest that such methods may not be suitable in Low and Middle-Income countries (LMICs), where re- sources and access to laboratory facilities are limited. Also, the complexity of pits and tank ty- pology in LMICs (i.e., unstandardised designs and sizes) may be a challenge to the use of FCs with fixed dimensions and set operational conditions. The variation in the quantification methods and resulting emission rates among the studies indicates that gaps prevail in the use of existing methods. Therefore, there is still a need for a simple field-based, easily adaptable FC method with adequate calibration and validation that can help in reliably quantifying the emissions from different OSS in any LMICs.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHeliyonen_US
dc.subjectGreenhouse gas emissionsen_US
dc.subjectOnsite sanitationen_US
dc.subjectPit latrinesen_US
dc.subjectSeptic tanksen_US
dc.titleField-based methods for measuring greenhouse gases emissions from on-site sanitation systems: A systematic review of published literatureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record